Long-Standing Typo in SAM-x

George Penokie george.penokie at avagotech.com
Wed Jun 4 05:57:00 PDT 2014


Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1406040_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

Paul,
I will fix the error, however, moving a state machine message terms out of
the state machine descriptions is not something I would agree with.
Bye for now,
George Penokie
Avago Technologies
3033 41 St NW
Rochester , MN 55901
507-328-9017
george.penokie at avagotech.com
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Paul Suhler <Paul.Suhler at hgst.com> wrote:
>  Hi, George.
>
>
>
> I confirmed that “Send SCSI Received” occurs only in the command
priority
> subclause.  It is referring to the SCSI Command Received transport protocol
> indication:
>
> If the Command Priority argument is set to zero or is not contained within
> the Send SCSI Command Received SCSI transport protocol service indication
> (see 5.4.2), and a priority has been assigned to the I_T_L nexus, then the
> device server shall use the specified priority for the I_T_L nexus as the
> command priority. […]
>
>
>
> However, the above wording makes it sound like the service indication is
> going directly to the device server.	Maybe we should just change it to the
> Command message, which is how the DS receives a command:
>
> If the Command Priority argument is set to zero or is not contained within
> the Send SCSI Received SCSI transport protocol service indication (see
> 5.4.2) Command message (see 8.9.4.4.1), and a priority has been assigned
> to the I_T_L nexus, then the device server shall use the specified priority
> for the I_T_L nexus as the command priority. […]
>
>
>
> So, I recommend the second alternative.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> *Paul A. Suhler, PhD*
>
> Research Staff Member
>
> HGST Research
> paul.suhler at hgst.com
> o: 949-476-1180 x275448
>
> m: 949-241-6443
>
> 3001 Daimler St.
> Santa Ana, CA 92705-5812
> www.hgst.com
>
>
>



More information about the T10 mailing list