12-1213 ASCQ

Ralph Weber roweber at ieee.org
Wed May 22 09:15:56 PDT 2013


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
George,
My understanding is that the need for a new ASC arises from an 
unpleasant interaction between Deferred Microcode Downloads and 
Sanitize. If this true, then the existing ASC will send the wrong message.
All the best,
.Ralph
On 5/22/2013 10:45 AM, Penokie, George wrote:
>
> John,
>
> In yesterdays discussion on 12-123 there was talk about adding a new 
> ASCQ. That is not needed as an ASCQ is already defined that can be 
> used. So just use this in your proposal:
>
> the additional sense code set to LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, SANITIZE IN 
> PROGRESS
>
> Bye for now,
>
> George Penokie
>
> LSI Corporation
>
> 3033 41 St NW
>
> Rochester , MN 55901
>
> 507-328-9017
>
> george.penokie at lsi.com
>
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org



More information about the T10 mailing list