SPC-4 LB Timestamp proposal posted
roweber at ieee.org
Fri May 3 18:08:31 PDT 2013
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
Thank you for this input. I have resolved the concern by adding a cross
reference to table 57 in the sentence that defines the timestamp origin
field in the REPORT TIMESTAMP command.
A revision that contains this change will be discussed in Bellevue.
All the best,
On 5/3/2013 1:25 PM, Gerry Houlder wrote:
> I think you need to retain the title of table 57 as "TIMESTAMP ORIGIN
> field". This is because text under table 311 refers to this clause as
> defining the TIMESTAMP ORIGIN field.
> Alternatively, move table 57 to follow table 311, so that the
> TIMESTAMP ORIGIN field definition follow right after it is needed. In
> this case, your text in blue that refers to table 57 would refer to
> the new table number in the new location.
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org
> > wrote:
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org <mailto:t10 at t10.org>),
> posted by:
> * Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org >
> I have posted a rewrite of the Timestamps (nee Device clocks)
> model for review next week..
> All the best,
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
> <mailto:majordomo at t10.org>
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10