spc4r33: persistent reservations preemtion
leonid.podolny at xtremio.com
Tue Jan 31 09:01:25 PST 2012
Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1201312_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
The questions 1 & 2 still stand, though. I can't find an answer in 220.127.116.11.
Sorry again for the noise.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Leonid Podolny
<leonid.podolny at xtremio.com>wrote:
> You are absolutely right, I forgot to say that all questions refer to
> PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT: PREEMPT.
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Penokie, George
<George.Penokie at lsi.com>wrote:
>> If I understand your questions which are not clear as they do not
>> indicate what commands are being issued.
>> If the command in your number 1 comment is a PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT
>> command with RELEASE service action, then the answer to number 1 is at the
>> end of section 18.104.22.168 Releasing and is stated as:
>> If there is no persistent reservation or in response to a persistent
>> reservation release request from a registered I_T
>> nexus that is not a persistent reservation holder (see 5.9.10), the
>> device server shall do the following:
>> a) not release the persistent reservation, if any;
>> b) not remove any registrations; and
>> c) complete the command with GOOD status.
>> If not then I have no idea what you are asking.
>> Your second question is impossible to answer without knowing what command
>> is being issued.
>> The text under figure 6 in section 22.214.171.124.4 Removing registrations
>> describes the case for an invalid SERVICE ACTION RESERVATION KEY:
>> If a PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT with a PREEMPT service action or a PREEMPT
>> AND ABORT service action
>> sets the SERVICE ACTION RESERVATION KEY field to a value that does not
>> match any registered reservation key, then
>> the device server shall complete the command with RESERVATION CONFLICT
>> Bye for now,
>> George Penokie
>> LSI Corporation
>> 3033 41 St NW
>> Rochester , MN 55901
>> george.penokie at lsi.com
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of Leonid
>> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:12 AM
>> To: t10 at t10.org
>> Subject: spc4r33: persistent reservations preemtion
>> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
>> * Leonid Podolny <leonid.podolny at xtremio.com>
>> Good day,
>> The most recent draft of SPC-4 doesn't seem to address two specific
>> scenarios. (Even if it does address these scenarios, it probably
>> merits a clarification, because I just can't find a definite answer).
>> I fail to understand the desired behavior in the following cases:
>> 1) There is no existing persistent reservation and SERVICE ACTION
>> RESERVATION KEY is zero. Should the server clean _all_ registrations
>> or return RESERVATION CONFLICT?
>> 2) There is an existing "All Registrants" reservation and the SERVICE
>> ACTION RESERVATION KEY equals the registration key of a requesting
>> nexus. Should the server remove the registration of the requesting
>> nexus (w/o creating a new reservation) or should it remove
>> registrations of all matching nexuses except for the requesting nexus?
>> If the answer is the latter, what happens with the reservation?
>> In addition, in figure 6, the server is required to validate the
>> SERVICE ACTION RESERVATION KEY (the second rhombus at the top left
>> corner of the figure). What is the criteria of the validity of the
>> SERVICE ACTION RESERVATION KEY?
>> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
>> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10