Proposal posted: SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
mickey.felton at emc.com
Fri Aug 17 07:44:00 PDT 2012
Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1208173_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Can you provide a reason?
I believe the reasoning from Alvin on 3 was because 1 and 2 were always
connected together on âother systemsâ..
From: T. C. McNally [mailto:tc.mcnally at newisys.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 8:51 AM
To: Besmer, Brad
Cc: Felton, Mickey; Alvin Cox; T10 Reflector
Subject: Re: Proposal posted: SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
Is the pin choice for POWER DISABLE negotiable? I would ask for this
function to be on P1.
T. C. Mc Nally
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Besmer, Brad
<Brad.Besmer at lsi.com> wrote:
Few discussion items:
1 - There is no associated support in SPL-2 for this (ie. Identify /
Discover). How does the attached entity know if the target device supports
this behavior or not?
2 âWhat happens to the link-state when the POWER DISABLE signal is
3 â How does attached device know if the device has been hot-swapped with a
4 â What other system-level impacts does this have?
From: owner-t10 at t10.org<mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org>
[mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org<mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org>] On Behalf Of Felton,
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:39 PM
To: Alvin Cox; T10 Reflector
Subject: RE: Proposal posted: SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
EMC agrees with the principal behind this proposal, but a few questions:
How long after stable 12V / 5V is the circuitry ready? Could it be asserted
while power is ramping up?
Does the input signal on the drive have any special edge or level
From: owner-t10 at t10.org<mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org> [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org]
On Behalf Of Alvin Cox
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 12:33 PM
To: T10 Reflector
Subject: Proposal posted: SAS-3 addition of POWER DISABLE
This proposal changes the functions of P1, P2, and P3 from 3.3V. The signal
assignment of these pins have been changed by other standards that intermate
with SAS connectors. Please review this proposal. The proposal may be
This proposal was introduced on the 8/16/12 SAS PHY call and will be the
first discussion item on the 8/23/12 SAS PHY call.
This proposal documents the changes associated with the addition of POWER
DISABLE to SAS-3. This function provides a means for the SAS target device
with a SAS Drive plug connector or SAS MultiLink Drive plug connector to
remove D.C. power (+5V and +12V) from the drive circuitry when the power
disable signal is driven high by the system. The POWER DISABLE signal is
specified on P3. If POWER DISABLE is not supported, P3 shall be not
connected. P1 and P2 are shorted together to provide the same connection as
on SAS drives compliant with versions of the SAS standard previous to SAS-3,
and to be consistent with the recommended implementation specified by SATA
since P1 and P2 have been retired and P3 may implement DEVSLP. The functional
polarity of POWER DISABLE is consistent with DEVSLP if the DEVSLP function is
Extensive research was done prior to drafting this proposal with respect to
system implementation on P1, P2, and P3. No instances were found where
systems provided 3.3V power to these pins. Maintaining the connection of P1
to P2 provided the widest support of legacy implementations that used the
pins for functionality not specified by the SAS standard.
Seagate Technology, LLC
E-Mail alvin.cox at seagate.com
This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any
copies of this email and any prints thereof.
ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT
INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar
substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary
hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are
not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and
are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or
any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity.
More information about the T10