Request Sense Handling of Deferred Errors
roweber at IEEE.org
Tue Apr 12 12:09:36 PDT 2011
Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1104122_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>
Okay! We have clarified the situation regarding the original message,
to whit the following statement is not strictly correct: "In the event
that the device server detects a deferred error condition, and then
subsequently receives a Request Sense command, should the deferred
error cause a Check Condition status to be returned for the Request
Sense command?" The presence of a deferred error is _*not*_ sufficient to
cause the REQUEST SENSE command to receive a CHECK CONDITION status.
The new question (i.e., should the REQUEST SENSE command be affected
by the presence of deferred error sense data?) is more challenging.
If the answer is yes, then the ordered list at the top of page 373
(see SPC-4 r30) needs to reflect this, probably via the addition of
an new entry.
Right or wrong, this is a normative change and cannot be made without
a T10 vote.
Those favoring the addition might take solace in the fact that the
current 4) entry in the list specifically mentions a recovered error
(detected _during_ the processing of the REQUEST SENSE command). I
suspect that some experts would see this as a description of one
particular instance of a deferred error, which necessarily leads
to the question of why this specific case is special.
Let's see how many SCSI gnomes this notion brings out of the
All the best,
On 4/12/2011 1:12 PM, Richard Deglin - SISA wrote:
> Nevertheless, the description of REQUEST SENSE does NOT include
> deferred errors in the list of returnable sense data. SPC4r30, page
> 373. This is a "shall" clause and I interpret it as meaning that
> REQUEST SENSE shall not return deferred error sense data because it is
> not explicitly listed. Of course, it is always possible that the
> different sections regarding sense data in SPC are in conflict or are
> ambiguous, and T10 perhaps needs to consider this and resolve the issues.
> Rich Deglin
> Senior Firmware Engineer, SAS SSD
> Samsung Information Systems America
> Office 408 544 5816
> Cell 408 410 6584
> *From:*owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Knight, Frederick
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2011 6:10 AM
> *To:* Truong Nguyen - SISA; t10 at t10.org
> *Subject:* RE: Request Sense Handling of Deferred Errors
> NO. This can be confusing, as there are 2 places where sense data is
> returned. One, is the autosense data that is associated with a
> command. The second is the data buffer that is returned in response
> to the REQUEST SENSE command.
> From the definition:
> *3.1.158 sense data: *Data describing an error or exceptional
> condition that a device server delivers to an application
> clientin the same I_T_L_Q nexus transaction (see 3.1.67) as the status
> or as parameter data in response to
> a REQUEST SENSE command (see 6.29). The format of sense data is
> defined in 4.5.
> The REDtext is the first (autosense), the GREENtext is the second
> (parameter data buffer) -- notice the "OR" between the two types of
> sense data.
> So, when there is a deferred error, and a REQUEST SENSE command is
> received, the parameter data bufferthat is returned will contain sense
> data that describes the deferred error. The autosense dataassociated
> with the REQUEST SENSE command will be associated with the GOOD status
> returned for the command itself.
> Basically, a successful REQUEST SENSE command returns GOOD status
> (with no autosense data); AND it returns a parameter data bufferthat
> happens to contain data that is in the format of sense data that
> describes the event (deferred error in your example).
> If the REQUEST SENSE command has a problem (an invalid field in the
> CDB for example), then the command will return an error status with
> autosense data that describes the problemwith the command (INVALID
> FIELD IN CDB). In this case, there is NO parameter data bufferto be
> returned, since the command failed. This is what 6.29 describes.
> Fred Knight
> *From:*Truong Nguyen - SISA [mailto:tru.nguyen at sisa.samsung.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 11, 2011 11:33 PM
> *To:* t10 at t10.org
> *Subject:* Request Sense Handling of Deferred Errors
> The Request Sense command definition in subclause 6.29 SPC4r30 states
> that the "device server shall return Check Condition status for
> a Request Sense command only to report exception conditions specific
> to the Request Sense command itself".
> Deferred errors may be indicated by returning Check Condition status
> as defined in subclause 4.5.5 in SPC4r30.
> In the event that the device server detects a deferred error
> condition, and then subsequently receives a Request Sense command,
> should the deferred error cause a Check Condition status to be
> returned for the Request Sense command? It would seem not, but some
> clarification would be appreciated.
> Truong Nguyen
> Samsung Information Systems America
More information about the T10