FCP-4: FCP_RSP IU Note

Matthew Jacob mj at feral.com
Wed Sep 22 12:45:05 PDT 2010


Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r1009222_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

  On 9/22/2010 11:53 AM, David Peterson wrote:
>
> FCP-4 still has the following note:
>
> NOTE 7 - Some early implementations presented the FCP_RSP IU without 
> the FCP_RESID field, FCP_SNS_LEN field, and FCP_RSP_LEN field if the 
> FCP_RESID_UNDER bit, FCP_RESID_OVER bit, FCP_SNS_LEN_VALID bit, and 
> FCP_RSP_LEN_VALID bit were all set to zero. This non-standard behavior 
> should be tolerated.
>
> Are there still implementations that present the FCP_RSP IU without 
> the FCP_RESID field, FCP_SNS_LEN field, and FCP_RSP_LEN field if the 
> FCP_RESID_UNDER bit, FCP_RESID_OVER bit, FCP_SNS_LEN_VALID bit, and 
> FCP_RSP_LEN_VALID bit were all set to zero ?
>
> I would really hope that we have moved past this non-standard behavior 
> and would like to remove this note.
>
> Thanks...Dave
>
Yes, there are implementations still out there deployed that still have 
this behavior.



More information about the T10 mailing list