George.Penokie at lsi.com
Wed Jul 7 07:13:40 PDT 2010
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Penokie, George" <George.Penokie at lsi.com>
Thanks for that information. At this point my only recourse seems be to
request SPL be changed to conform with the current SFF- 8485. When (or if)
SFF-8485 is updated then we can change SPL-2 to match it.
Bye for now,
3033 41st St. NW
Rochester, MN 55901
george.penokie at lsi.com
From: Dal Allan [mailto:endlcom at acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 8:03 PM
To: Penokie, George
Cc: T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org)
Subject: Re: SPL issue
> Anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this?
Only the obvious: publish a Rev 0.8 of SFF-8085 which synchronizes with
SFF-8485 was sent to editor Barry Olawsky's backburner because SFF-8636
Common Management Interface and SFF-8449 Mini Multilane Series Management
Interface were deemed higher priority at T10. You may have just altered
I don't know how easy producing a new revision would be, or how long it would
take, that is Barry's call.
If there is a schedule issue, we can handle that with accelerated balloting.
All the best,
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10