Comment on 09-063r5

Penokie, George George.Penokie at
Tue Oct 20 14:49:51 PDT 2009

Formatted message: <a href="">HTML-formatted message</a>

The minutes are correct. I recorded a lot of editorial comments during the
meeting but, at the meeting but I didn't request a new version of the
proposal be generated as the changes where ones that I would have made during
incorporation if I would have seen them. But I came to my senses when I
looked at again last week and decided to create a rev 5 that would be exactly
what I would put into SPL so as to not to bury any changes.
So that's why there is a rev 5.
Bye for now,
George Penokie
LSI Corporation
3033 41st St. NW
Suite 100
Rochester, MN 55901
george.penokie at
From: owner-t10 at [mailto:owner-t10 at] On Behalf Of
Gerry.Houlder at
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 1:06 PM
To: t10 at
Subject: Comment on 09-063r5
I have noted that the minutes of the Sept. Plenary meeting record that
09-063r4 was accepted for inclusion in SPL. Should the minutes actually state
"rev. 4 as ammended during the meeting" or perhaps say "rev. 5"? If the
minutes are actually correct (that rev. 4 was accepted) then what would be
the status of rev. 5?

More information about the T10 mailing list