Possible typo in SPL (this came from SASr16 as well)

Bill.Martin at emulex.com Bill.Martin at emulex.com
Tue Jul 21 13:24:17 PDT 2009


Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r0907210_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

In 9.2.10.6 the following text exists:
9.2.10.2.6.3 Transition SA_PC_4:Stopped to SA_PC_5:Active_Wait
This transition shall occur if:
a) a START STOP UNIT command with the POWER CONDITION field set to 0h (i.e.,
START_VALID) and the START bit set to one is processed; or
b) a START STOP UNIT command with the POWER CONDITION field set to ACTIVE is
processed.
If the transition is based on a START STOP UNIT command with the IMMED bit
set to zero, then the device server shall not complete the command until this
state machine reaches the SA_PC_1:Active state.
The last sentence is based on the transition to SA_PC_1:Active state; however
the transition is actually to the SA_PC_5:Active_Wait state. I believe that
the last sentence should read:
If the transition is based on a START STOP UNIT command with the IMMED bit
set to zero, then the device server shall not complete the command until this
state machine reaches the SA_PC_5:Active_Wait state.
Bill Martin
Emulex
Office of Technology
Industry Standards
916 772-3658
916 765-6875 (Cell)
bill.martin at emulex.com



More information about the T10 mailing list