SPACE ALLOCATION IN PROCESS --> SPACE ALLOCATION IN PROGRESS

jgeldman at lexar.com jgeldman at lexar.com
Wed Feb 25 11:37:57 PST 2009


Formatted message: <a href="http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=r&f=r0902252_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</a>

"Affected Editors",
I'll bite. I don't understand the difference between the English
definitions. Perhaps I would care if I understood.
Did someone spell "PROCESS" wrong and request "PROGRESS" to cover up?
Please explain the rationale for this change.
John
________________________________
From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org] On Behalf Of Ralph
Weber
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:25 AM
To: 't10 at t10.org'
Subject: SPACE ALLOCATION IN PROCESS --> SPACE ALLOCATION IN PROGRESS
After lengthy discussions between the affected editors, we
have decided to change IN PROCESS to IN PROGRESS as per the
request duplicated below. This change will be reflected in
the next major revisions of SPC-4 and SBC-3.
Complaints about this change, if any, should be posted to 
this reflector before the March T10 meeting week.
All the best,
.Ralph
-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject:	spc4r18: space allocation in process?	
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:39:11 +0100 
From:	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert at interlog.com>
	
Reply-To:	dgilbert at interlog.com	
To:	roweber at ieee.org	
The recently added asc/ascq code 4h,14h looks a bit odd
when compared to the adjacent entries:
....
04h/04h  DTL  RO   B	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, FORMAT IN PROGRESS
04h/05h  DT  W O A BK F  LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, REBUILD IN PROGRESS
04h/06h  DT  W O A BK	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, RECALCULATION IN
PROGRESS
04h/07h  DTLPWROMAEBKVF  LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, OPERATION IN PROGRESS
04h/08h       R 	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, LONG WRITE IN PROGRESS
04h/09h  DTLPWROMAEBKVF  LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, SELF-TEST IN PROGRESS
04h/0Ah  DTLPWROMAEBKVF  LOGICAL UNIT NOT ACCESSIBLE, ASYMMETRIC ACCESS
STATE ... 
04h/0Bh  DTLPWROMAEBKVF  LOGICAL UNIT NOT ACCESSIBLE, TARGET PORT IN
STANDBY STATE
04h/0Ch  DTLPWROMAEBKVF  LOGICAL UNIT NOT ACCESSIBLE, TARGET PORT IN
UNA...
04h/0Dh 	      F  LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, STRUCTURE CHECK
REQUIRED
04h/10h  DT  WROM  B	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, AUXILIARY MEMORY NOT
ACCESSIBLE
04h/11h  DT  WRO AEB VF  LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, NOTIFY (ENABLE SPINUP)
REQUIRED
04h/12h 	M    V	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, OFFLINE
04h/13h  DT   R MAEBKV	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, SA CREATION IN PROGRESS
04h/14h  D	   B	 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, SPACE ALLOCATION IN
PROCESS
Would "in progress" (rather than "in process") be more consistent?
Doug Gilbert



More information about the T10 mailing list