Tim Jones tjmac at
Thu Aug 6 16:10:25 PDT 2009

* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at, posted by:
* Tim Jones <tjmac at>
Agreed - but how about
On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Kevin D Butt wrote:
> Fred Knight's proposal 09-099r1 to add a new status named GOOD WITH  
> SENSE has met with some confusion and complaints internal to IBM.   
> I believe that the confusion and complaints can mostly be addressed  
> by changing the name.  As seen by George's proposal to use this,  
> the data returned is not sense data.	The current name implies that  
> sense data is returned with GOOD status.  In reality, what is  
> returned is information that needs to be defined for each use of  
> it.  Thus, a better name would be something like GOOD WITH  
> Thanks,
> Kevin D. Butt
> SCSI & Fibre Channel Architect, Tape Firmware
> MS 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
> Tel: 520-799-5280
> Fax: 520-799-2723 (T/L:321)
> Email address: kdbutt at
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at

More information about the T10 mailing list