Posted: Pioneer counter proposal

Reiner Kopf rkopf at
Tue Jan 8 09:20:46 PST 2008

Formatted message: <A HREF="r0801083_f.htm">HTML-formatted message</A>

Dear Katata-san,
just a comment from Nero's side to the statement in Pioneer's proposal:
2.3. Reporting logical unit performance capabilities to the end user;
   Providing the user the choice of a given performance profile within
   the list of available performance profiles
   No end user requests such capability and the chance of the choice.
   This will cause end user confusion and careless mistake.
 From host side I can confirm that end users have a demand on selecting
a read/write speed out of a given set of speeds the drive supports.
Of course the host software will offer only speeds to the end user which
makes sense depending on the intended media type to be read/written.
E.g if no media is loaded, with the current specification the host
software cannot offer the correct read/write speeds to the end user and
thus not guarantee that reading/writing will be performed at the selected
So in order to increase the "user friendliness" there is indeed a need
to report the logical unit performance capabilities for the drive.
Best regards,
Reiner Kopf
Nero AG
At 15:06 27.12.2007 +0900, keiji_katata at wrote:
>Hello all,
>I posted a counter proposal for 1/9 SWG.
> Stream Model.doc
>Best regards,
>Keiji Katata
>TEL +81-49-279-2387
Reiner Kopf
E-Mail rkopf at
Nero AG
Im Stoeckmaedle 13-15
76307 Karlsbad
Vorstand/CEO: Richard Lesser
Aufsichtsratvorsitzender/Chairman of the supervisory board: Jim Corbett
Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB 362519
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient (or
have received this e-mail in error) please notify the
sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of
the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

More information about the T10 mailing list