MMC-5 Draft Planning

Ralph Weber roweber at IEEE.org
Wed Jan 25 16:02:32 PST 2006


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* Ralph Weber <roweber at ieee.org>
*
Gerry,

In MMC-5, each command is associated with one or more features.
The mandatory/optional nature of each command depends on the
associated features.

There is no way to represent this in a single column in one table.

If you look at the beginning of the subclause for each command,
you will find a table listing features and when the command is
mandatory.

I think the MMC-5 has dealt with the complex situation quite well.

All the best,

.Ralph

Gerry.Houlder at seagate.com wrote:

>* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
>* Gerry.Houlder at seagate.com
>*
>It appears that commands described in SPC-x  (apparently SPC-3 in the case
>of MMC-5) are not specifically referenced as to whether they are mandatory,
>optional, or otherwise for MMC-5 devices. Other command set standards
>(e.g., SBC) include the SPC commands in the equivalent of MMC-5 tables 228
>and 229, specifies whether the command is mandatory or optional, and
>references SPC-x in the reference column. Is there a reason why MMC-5
>doesn't follow this pattern also?
>

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org





More information about the T10 mailing list