spc3r21c.pdf tupo kib != KiB

Matthew Jacob mj at feral.com
Thu Jan 20 11:14:13 PST 2005


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Matthew Jacob" <mj at feral.com>
*
Grawk! My prejudices misled me. I had it exactly backwards because standard
usage is exactly the opposite of the standards. Sigh.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pat LaVarre [mailto:p.lavarre at ieee.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 5:54 AM
To: Matthew Jacob
Cc: t10 at t10.org
Subject: Re: spc3r21c.pdf tupo kib != KiB


>>> The phrase "one kibibit is 1 Kib is 1 024 bits" appears in
>
> Further, under recent practices I've seen in the industry for TiB for 
> one trillion and TB for 2**40, won't Kib or kiB be somewhat out of 
> step and confusing?

Fun.

I trust you agree the http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html 
that Bob & I cited defines Ti Gi Mi Ki to mean 2 raised to the powers 
40 30 20 10, together with T G M K defined to mean 10 raised to the 
powers 12 9 6 3, helpfully situated near the pun of "mebibytes" 
pronounced like "may be bytes".  Me, I'm now guessing in spc3r21c.pdf 
there's some assymetry near the phrase "one kibibit is 1 Kib is 1 024 
bits"  that originally misled my eye, but I haven't found it again yet. 
  Also now I notice my English and theirs collides: by 40 30 20 10 I 
mean a list of four numbers, by their 1 024 they mean one number of 
four digits, not two numbers in a list.

PEL


*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list