QA Action Item: ASCQ
dburg at nero.com
Tue Feb 1 02:23:10 PST 2005
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* David Burg <dburg at nero.com>
I can get 5/21/00 by writing to a LBA outside the user addressable=20
it? (That is, the starting address of the write is invalid).
Furthermore, WRITE10 and WRITE12 CDBs field are "Logical Block =
WRITE AND VERIFY10 CDB has "Starting Logical Address" (... in MMC 4, =
not in Mt
Fuji 5). 5/21/03 makes it clear that the range (start to end) of the =
the issue, 5/21/00 means for me that the start address, LBA, is not =
(out of range).
Is it clearer?
Quoting keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp:
> How are you confused? What information do you receive from the error =
> Let me know what is different between two errors for Write10 command.
> 5/21/00: LOGICAL BLOCK ADDRESS OUT OF RANGE
> 5/21/03: INVALID RANGE FOR WRITE
> Technically both have same description. So someone may be confused.
> I think both show that the first address is correct (match with NWA). =
> an address on the way is not correct. There may be two typical =
> is NWA disappears at the End sector number of the recordable disc. =
> is NWA jumps to other layer due to layer jump. From Write start =
> may see the root cause. It may be enough information for debug?
> Best regards,
> Keiji Katata
> PIONEER CORP.
> "Jason Ng" <Jason_Ng at sonic.com> on 2005/02/01 03:58:36
> =E5=AE=9B=E5=85=88: "David Burg" <dburg at nero.com>, =
<mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com>,
> <keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp>
> cc: <T10 at t10.org>
> =E4=BB=B6=E5=90=8D: RE: QA Action Item: ASCQ
> Hi All,
> I agree with David on this point. It would also help during software
> development to know the exact specific error being reported so we can
> identify the problem easier and quicker.
> Jason Ng
> Sonic Solutions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-t10 at t10.org on behalf of David Burg
> Sent: Mon 1/31/2005 8:35 AM
> To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com; =
keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp
> Cc: T10 at t10.org
> Subject: Re: QA Action Item: ASCQ
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
> * David Burg <dburg at nero.com>
> Hi all,
> I feel confused by all existing error codes. I favor the =
> error code
> from Katata-san.
> Best regards,
> David Burg
> Software Development
> Nero AG
> Im Stoeckmaedle 18
> 76307 Karlsbad email: dburg at nero.com
> Germany http://www.nero.com
> Quoting keiji_katata at post.pioneer.co.jp:
> > Hi all,
> > Here is my action item about ASCQ of Write command =
> Layer Jump
> > point.
> > Question:
> > When single Write command is issued crossing the layer =
> address, what
> > error code shall be reported?
> > Proposals:
> > Existing Error Code
> > 5/21/00: LOGICAL BLOCK ADDRESS OUT OF RANGE
> > This shows that start address is correct, but =
> not correct.
> > 5/21/02: INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE
> > This shows that start address may not be =
> range may not
> > be correct.
> > 5/24/00: INVALID FIELD IN CDB
> > This shows that some field in CDB is not =
> > 3/0C/07: WRITE ERROR. RECOVERY NEEDED
> > This shows that something is wrong. How to =
> > New Error Code
> > 5/21/03: INVALID RANGE FOR WRITE
> > Creating new error code is too much?
> > Which do you favor?
> > Best regards,
> > Keiji Katata
> > PIONEER CORP.
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to
> majordomo at t10.org
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10