Format Unit Command Translation
Parry, Owen
owen.parry at lsil.com
Tue Aug 16 12:09:45 PDT 2005
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Parry, Owen" <owen.parry at lsil.com>
*
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A296.104D9A80
Content-Type: text/plain
In SAT revision 5, does anyone know why the return code is CHECK
CONDITION / ILLEGAL REQUEST / INVALID FIELD IN PARAMATER LIST instead of
CHECK CONDITION / ILLEGAL REQUEST / INVALID FIELD IN CDB, if the Defect
List Format field is non-zero?
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A296.104D9A80
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
Format Unit Command Translation In SAT revision 5, does = anyone know why the return code is CHECK CONDITION / ILLEGAL REQUEST / = INVALID FIELD IN PARAMATER LIST instead of CHECK CONDITION / ILLEGAL REQUEST / INVALID FIELD IN = CDB, if the Defect List Format = field is non-zero?
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A296.104D9A80--
More information about the T10
mailing list