SPC-3 r22a uploaded

Ralph O. Weber roweber at IEEE.org
Wed Apr 20 17:57:40 PDT 2005


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Ralph O. Weber" <roweber at ieee.org>
*
Regarding requested changed 5:

If there is an equivalent of table 324 in SPC-2 that shows a
definition of 01b that can be described as 'obsolete' in SPC-3,
then the requested change is appropriate.  NOT!

Otherwise, 'Reserved' might be appropriate, or 'Vendor Specific'.

All the best,

.Ralph

Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:

>* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
>* "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <elliott at hp.com>
>*
>If SPC-3 revision 22a is reopened per 05-148 and 05-150, here are a few
>more trivial editorial corrections to include:
> 
>1. Section 4.5.1 item b), change MODE PARAMETERS HAVE CHANGED to MODE
>PARAMETERS CHANGED
>
>2. Section 6.26 table 169 REPORT TIMESTAMP parameter data format, remove
>unwanted vertical lines from bytes 0 and 1
>
>3. Section 7.2.9 bottom of printed page 259, remove underlines from
>"identify" and "standard"
>
>4. Section 7.4.8 add period to end of sentence ending in MODE PARAMETERS
>CHANGED
>
>5. Section 7.6.6 table 324 (Mode page policy) change 10b from "per
>initiator port" to "obsolete" (as requested by an accepted letter ballot
>comment)
>
>  
>


*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org





More information about the T10 mailing list