opcode 9E conflict between Read Capacity (16) and Read Long (16)

Gen-Hwa Chiang gchiang at candera.com
Fri Sep 24 12:05:45 PDT 2004


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Gen-Hwa Chiang" <gchiang at candera.com>
*
I think Read Capacity (16) should have Opcode 0x95.  Is this correct? 

> Gen-Hwa Chiang
> Candera Inc.
> 673 S. Milpitas Blvd.
> Milpitas, CA 95035
> T: 408.228.6536
> F: 408.228.6501
> 
> "Though I walk in the midst of trouble, you preserve my life;..." Psalm 138:7
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Gen-Hwa Chiang  
> Sent:	Friday, September 24, 2004 12:04 PM
> To:	't10 at t10.org'
> Subject:	opcode 9E conflict between Read Capacity (16) and Read Long (16)
> 
> Looks like there is an opcode conflict in the sbc2r15a.pdf.  Anyone knows the real opcode for the above commands?
> 
> Gen-Hwa Chiang
> Candera Inc.
> 673 S. Milpitas Blvd.
> Milpitas, CA 95035
> T: 408.228.6536
> F: 408.228.6501
> 
> "Though I walk in the midst of trouble, you preserve my life;..." Psalm 138:7
> 
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list