Call for definition of WORM for SSC-3
Ralph O. Weber
roweber at IEEE.org
Thu Jul 15 06:59:56 PDT 2004
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Ralph O. Weber" <roweber at ieee.org>
*
How does the proposed SSC-3 work relate to the Write-once device
(e.g., some optical disks) device type defined in SBC and made
obsolete in SBC-2?
If this work is important, would it be more appropriate to revise
the SBC definition in SBC-2 instead of making the definition
obsolete?
Please note that I am not at all thrilled by the idea of devoting
two scarce device type codes to a single device type.
All the best,
.Ralph
Kevin D Butt wrote:
> The SSC-3 working group is looking to define WORM as it relates to
> streaming devices. There has turned out to be a wide range of
> definitions among the four companies who made comments. As such, we
> wish to request all that have an interest to submit their definition
> of what WORM is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin D. Butt
> Fibre Channel & SCSI Architect, IBM Tape Microcode,
> 6TYA, 9000 S. Rita Rd., Tucson, AZ 85744
> Tie-line 321; Office: 520-799-5280, Lab: 799-5751, Fax: 799-4138,
> Email: kdbutt at us.ibm.com
>
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10
mailing list