Backwards Incompatible fix for PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT SPEC_I_PTadditionalparameter data bug

Holt, Keith kholt at lsil.com
Thu Jul 24 13:25:17 PDT 2003


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Holt, Keith" <kholt at lsil.com>
*
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C35221.7A2BC796
Content-Type: text/plain

I'm told that the second option would work much better, and that we
could accommodate this change easily. 

Keith 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ralph Weber [ mailto:ralphoweber at compuserve.com
 ] 
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:06 PM 
To: T10, Reflector 
Cc: Holt, Keith 
Subject: Re: Backwards Incompatible fix for PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT 
SPEC_I_PTadditionalparameter data bug 


Keith, 

What about the second change option proposed in 03-210r0? 

Thanks. 

.Ralph 

Holt, Keith wrote: 

> Ralph, 
> 
> I confirmed that we have implemented the ability to register multiple 
> initiator ports with a single PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT command and find 
> the change proposed in 03-210r1 to be unacceptable. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Keith Holt 
> LSI Logic Storage Systems Inc. 
> keith.holt at lsil.com 
> 



------_=_NextPart_001_01C35221.7A2BC796
Content-Type: text/html

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

 RE: Backwards Incompatible fix for PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT SPEC_I_PTadditionalparameter data bug I'm told that the second option would work much better, and that we could accommodate this change easily. Keith -----Original Message----- 
From: Ralph Weber [mailto:ralphoweber at compuserve.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:06 PM 
To: T10, Reflector 
Cc: Holt, Keith 
Subject: Re: Backwards Incompatible fix for PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT 
SPEC_I_PTadditionalparameter data bug 
Keith, What about the second change option proposed in 03-210r0? Thanks. .Ralph Holt, Keith wrote: > Ralph, 
> 
> I confirmed that we have implemented the ability to register multiple 
> initiator ports with a single PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT command and find 
> the change proposed in 03-210r1 to be unacceptable. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Keith Holt 
> LSI Logic Storage Systems Inc. 
> keith.holt at lsil.com 
> 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C35221.7A2BC796--




More information about the T10 mailing list