MMC-x meant where MMC-2 said

Pat LaVarre LAVARRE at iomega.com
Thu Feb 13 12:41:55 PST 2003


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Pat LaVarre" <LAVARRE at iomega.com>
*
> http://www.t10.org/scsi-3.htm
> ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/drafts/spc3/spc3r11.pdf
> Table 57 — Peripheral device type
> 05h MMC-2 CD-ROM device

Is the "-2" of "MMC-2" significant here?

Or should I read "MMC-2" to mean "MMC" whose bleeding edge I'm told is:
ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/drafts/mmc4/mmc4r01f.pdf

Curiously, cluelessly, thankfully yours, Pat LaVarre

P.S. Would be nice if scsi-3.htm distinguished "final drafts" from the lesser drafts of the bleeding edge.

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list