SAS-03f, Idles after CLOSE

Day, Brian bday at lsil.com
Fri Apr 11 09:14:22 PDT 2003


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Day, Brian" <bday at lsil.com>
*
Mark and others...

If there is such an intention, was it to also remove
the six idle dwords after BREAK sequence in
7.14.4.7.1 SL_CC5:BreakWait state?

Thanks...

Brian Day
LSI Logic


-----Original Message-----
From: Evans, Mark [mailto:Mark_Evans at maxtor.com]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 9:31 AM
To: t10 at t10.org
Subject: SAS-03f, Idles after CLOSE


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Evans, Mark" <Mark_Evans at maxtor.com>
*
Hello,

For SAS rev 3f:  it's my understanding that the intention was to remove the
requirement for transmitting three Idle Dwords after a CLOSE sequence from
the draft standard.  However, it appears to me that this requirement still
appears in item 2 in the bulleted list in 7.14.4.61 [SL_CC4:DisconnectWait
state] State description.  If, in reality, the requirement has been removed,
item 2 should be removed as well.

Regards,

Mark Evans
Maxtor Corporation
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list