PREEMPT or PREEMPT AND ABORT service action

Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) Elliott at hp.com
Tue Oct 8 18:29:40 PDT 2002


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott at hp.com>
*
Correct; if there is no persistent reservation there is no persistent
reservation holder.

--
Rob Elliott, elliott at hp.com
Industry Standard Server Storage Advanced Technology
Hewlett-Packard



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Craig [mailto:kcraig at istor.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:18 PM
> To: t10 at t10.org
> Subject: PREEMPT or PREEMPT AND ABORT service action
> 
> 
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
> * "Ken Craig" <kcraig at istor.com>
> *
> 
> I want to make sure that my interpretation of
> Section 5.5.2.7.4.4 (Removing registrations)
> from the latest SPC-3 rev. is valid.  My
> question is
> 
> Would it be a correct interpretation of this
> section to say that the phrase
> 
> "Does not identify a persistent reservation holder"
> 
> covers the case where there is no persistent
> reservation in effect when the PREEMPT type service
> action is received?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kenneth Ray Craig, Jr.
> *
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
> 
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list