October Mt. Fuji meeting minutes
tanikawa at post.pioneer.co.jp
tanikawa at post.pioneer.co.jp
Mon Oct 7 15:39:25 PDT 2002
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* tanikawa at post.pioneer.co.jp
Thank you for your polite explanation.
Then, We are expecting your participation to the next meeting.
More over, if you have any supplementary document for deepening an
understanding of your proposal,
please post them to reflector prior to the next meeting.
It would be quite helpful for us.
"Henry Gabryjelski" <henrygab at windows.microsoft.com>@avc-pioneer.com on
mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
$BAw?.<T(B: owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
$B08 at h(B: <mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com>, <t10 at t10.org>
$B7oL>(B: RE: October Mt. Fuji meeting minutes
It was our intention to have a representative at the October Mt. Fuji
meeting. Unfortunately, Emily-san was unable to attend only two weeks
prior to the meeting. I prepared to go, but instead we had Mitsuru Saito
of Microsoft Japan agree to provide a presentation I had prepared. It is
unknown at this time why he was unable to go. I apologize most sincerely
for any inconvenience this may have caused the group.
Please see my original post; Microsoft hopes to provide a presentation
regarding this feature in the next Fuji meeting.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tanikawa at post.pioneer.co.jp
> [mailto:tanikawa at post.pioneer.co.jp]
> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com; t10 at t10.org
> Subject: RE: October Mt. Fuji meeting minutes
> Hi Henry,
> Your pointed portion was reported by Katata-san as MMC4
> liaison report.
> His report may be including his incorrect interpretation
> regarding your
> Although , there was no time to discuss, your proposal was
> carried forward
> to the next meeting.
> We would appreciate it if you could give us the correct input
> "Firmware information feature" at next meeting.
> Because, we still do not surely understand if it work correctly.
> Best Regards,
> Toshiro Tanikawa
> "Henry Gabryjelski"
> <henrygab at windows.microsoft.com>@avc-pioneer.com on
> 2002/10/05 00:30:05
> mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com$B$KJV?.$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
> $BAw?.<T(B: owner-mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
> $B08 at h(B: <mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com>
> cc: <t10 at t10.org>
> $B7oL>(B: RE: October Mt. Fuji meeting minutes
> As there were no Microsoft attendees listed for the October Fuji
> meeting, I would like to know where the following information in the
> minutes originated:
> "Microsoft wants to know the implementation version by using the
> firmware compilation date. Because, there are several ways of CD-R/RW
> implementation. To distinguish these differences, this information can
> be used."
> This information is not an accurate translation of the
> reasons for this
> feature. Propogation of this false information is highly discouraged.
> Anyways, perhaps in the next US meeting, a clearer description of the
> reasons for this feature can be provided by Emily-san.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: takeshi_kohda at post.pioneer.co.jp
> > [mailto:takeshi_kohda at post.pioneer.co.jp]
> > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:58 AM
> > To: mtfuji5 at avc-pioneer.com
> > Cc: t10 at t10.org
> > Subject: October Mt. Fuji meeting minutes
> > A PDF of October Mt. Fuji meeting minutes is available at:
> > ftp://ftp.avc-pioneer.com/Mtfuji5/Minutes/MinOct02.pdf
> > Best Regards,
> > -----
> > Takeshi Kohda
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10