SPI-4 rev 9 problem

Bellamy, Wayne Wayne.Bellamy at COMPAQ.com
Wed Mar 6 11:41:56 PST 2002


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Bellamy, Wayne" <Wayne.Bellamy at COMPAQ.com>
*
I agree with Bill. I would like to also request the same "NS" be applied
to Modify Data Pointer and Modify Bidirectional Data Pointer (Save Data
Pointers already has "NS"). Is it reasonable to request "NS" on
Disconnect under the IU Transfers Enabled column? Otherwise, it might be
possible to expect some targets to randomly...(possibly?)...perform a
Disconnect message rather than go Bus Free or issue a QAS Request
message with IU Transfers Enabled.

wayne    

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Galloway [mailto:BillG at breatech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:16 PM
To: T10 Reflector
Subject: SPI-4 rev 9 problem


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Bill Galloway" <BillG at breatech.com>
*
In 16.3.1 Link control message codes Table 65 there appears to be a
problem.

I think the two "O"s for RESTORE POINTERS under IU Transfers Enabled
should be "NS".
First, does anyone else agree, and second what if anything should we do
about it?

Bill Galloway
BREA Technologies, Inc.
P: (281) 530-3063
F: (281) 988-0358
BillG at breatech.com 

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list