FCP-2: Figure C17/C19 incorrect.
dap at cisco.com
Thu Aug 1 07:48:30 PDT 2002
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Dave Peterson" <dap at cisco.com>
You are correct and I have added this to the list.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-t10 at t10.org [mailto:owner-t10 at t10.org]On Behalf Of Santosh
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:13 PM
> To: T10 Reflector
> Cc: Dave Peterson; Robert Snively; Fibre Channel T11 reflector
> Subject: FCP-2: Figure C17/C19 incorrect.
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
> * Santosh Rao <santoshr at cup.hp.com>
> We have found an inconsistency between the SLER error recovery described
> in Section 126.96.36.199 and the Annexe figures C.17 & C.19 in the FCP-2 Rev
> 7a spec.
> Fig C17/C19 state that on a lost read data, unacknowledged classes, the
> ACC for the REC indicates that the target does not hold sequence
> initiative and the exchange is "open".
> This is incorrect, since the REC ACC will indicate that the target does
> not hold sequence initiative and the exchange is *complete*, when
> FCP_CONF is not in use. (The target would have sent the FCP_RSP,
> following the completion of data phase.)
> Fig C17/C19 should be modified to indicate that :
> - No FCP_CONF is in use
> - the sequence initiative is not held by the target.
> - exchange is complete.
> - Initiator's "Data Transfer Count" is less than target's "Data Transfer
> Count" which is reported in the REC ACC.
> Education is when you read the fine print.
> Experience is what you get if you don't.
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10