Revised Fibre-Channel over SCTP/IP
muralir at lightsand.com
Mon Sep 25 14:43:49 PDT 2000
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Murali Rajagopal" <muralir at lightsand.com>
A clarification is in order:
Note that the IPS WG still has not chosen (by rough consensus) which method
to encapsulate FC. Currently, there are two proposals on the table: IP and
there will a third one using TCP.
I beleive that at the San Diego metting (December), we will know.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis at sanlight.net>
To: "Ips" <ips at ece.cmu.edu>
Cc: "Elizabeth G Rodriguez (Elizabeth)" <egrodriguez at lucent.com>; "fc"
<fc at network.com>; "T10" <t10 at t10.org>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 11:50 AM
Subject: Revised Fibre-Channel over SCTP/IP
> The IPS (Internet Protocol Storage) Work Group is officially under IETF
> Transport Area.
> Included are changes to illustrate a strategy involved in allowing both
> native IP access and FC encapsulation. In addition, a credit token scheme
> similar to FC Class 3 has been implemented. The disscussion reflector is
> ips at ece.cmu.edu
> to subscribe send email to majordomo at ece.cmu.edu and within the message
> body- subscribe ips
> the website is at http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ips.
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10