Persistent Reservation question

George_Penokie/Tivoli_Systems%TIVOLI_SYSTEMS at us.ibm.com George_Penokie/Tivoli_Systems%TIVOLI_SYSTEMS at us.ibm.com
Mon Nov 13 14:59:04 PST 2000


* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* George_Penokie/Tivoli_Systems%TIVOLI_SYSTEMS at us.ibm.com
*
David,
All types of reservations are confined to a logical unit. So if you have 6
logical units you could have 6 reservations from 6 different initiators.

Bye for now,
George Penokie

Dept 2C6  114-2 N212
E-Mail:    gpenokie at tivoli.com
Internal:  553-5208
External: 507-253-5208   FAX: 507-253-2880


"Ulrich, David" <dulrich at lsil.com>@t10.org on 11/13/2000 03:41:33 PM

Sent by:  owner-t10 at t10.org


To:   "'t10 at t10.org'" <t10 at t10.org>
cc:
Subject:  Persistent Reservation question





I have a question regarding the degree of mutual exclusion of RESERVE
commands and PERSISTENT RESERVE IN/OUT commands.

In the SPC-2 working draft rev. 18, section 5.5.1, page 21, the third
paragraph states that "if a logical unit has been reserved by any RESERVE
command and is still reserved by any initiator, all PERSISTENT RESERVE IN
and all PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT commands shall conflict regardless of
initiator or service action and shall terminate with a RESERVATION CONFLICT
status".

My question is, does that mean a PERSISTENT RESERVE IN/OUT command to any
logical unit or only the logical unit that is reserved using a RESERVE
command?  In other words, can the two different types of reservations
co-exist as long as they have been executed by different logical units?

Thanks.

David Ulrich
dulrich at lsil.com
Storage Systems Division
LSI Logic Inc.




*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org




More information about the T10 mailing list