FCP-2 recovery problem
Dave.Baldwin at emulex.com
Mon Jun 26 20:10:57 PDT 2000
* From the T10 Reflector (t10 at t10.org), posted by:
* "Baldwin, Dave" <Dave.Baldwin at emulex.com>
It would not work with the change you are suggesting. If I send OX_ID=1 and
CRN=6 to LUN=1, then send CRN 7 through CRN 5 (wraparound) to LUN=2 (maybe a
disk), then send OX_ID=1 and CRN=6 to LUN=1 (which gets dropped), I have the
Matt Wakeley wrote:
> * From the fc reflector, posted by:
> * Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley at agilent.com>
> If the CRN was *not* based on LU, your proposal would work...
> "Binford, Charles" wrote:
> > At this point my plan is working - single LUN. But consider Multi-LUN.
> > IF
> > you change the scenario only slightly we break:
> > CMD ------OX_ID=1, CRN=6, LUN=1 ---------------------->
> > <--------------------------- Response
> > CMD -----OX_ID=1, CRN=6, LUN=2 -----> X (dropped frame)
> If the above had a CRN of 7 (since both LUs are in the same target),
> everything would work fine.
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at t10.org
More information about the T10