Draft minutes of SCSI Working Group - 9/16/98

Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
Thu Sep 24 15:22:58 PDT 1998


* From the T10 (formerly SCSI) Reflector (t10 at symbios.com), posted by:
* Gene_Milligan at notes.seagate.com
*
Regarding 5.1:

     The minutes may be accurate but I do not understand <<Snively
questioned the possibility that multiple paths between initiators and
targets might become a part of SAM-2.  Ralph stated a belief that such will
not be the result.>> Sorry to argue with myself, I do understand it. But
for those not participating directly it would be helpful had Ralph gone on
to say "although SAM-2 is intended to document optional multiple paths
between initiators and task servers." Did he say that?

Regarding 6.2:

<< The group reviewed the history of the problem.>> Should go on to say
"and took no action at this meeting" or "and deferred any action pending
resolution of whether or not there was still support for completing HAP"?

Regarding 6.5:

<<Bob Snively reported that there no new information is available regarding
FCP-2.>> Did he really? If so it should be "Bob Snively reported that there
no new information is available regarding FCP-2." "But I though he said an
initial draft has not yet been generated." That is information.



*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo at symbios.com





More information about the T10 mailing list