Question on Synchronous data transfer

PAT LaVARRE (PAT LAVARRE) LAVARRE at iomega.com
Mon Mar 4 10:44:00 PST 1996


* From the SCSI Reflector, posted by:
* PAT LaVARRE (PAT LAVARRE) <LAVARRE at IOMEGA.COM>
*
> ... negative offset ...

Originally undocumented or permanently so?

Do we have a possible SCSI extension here? 
Even SCSI-III material?  Does anybody _want_
to carry this forward?

How might I go about finding out how the
1989 QLogic WD33C9x worked?

): My shipping product chokes and dies if
ever it sees a negative offset.  On the
other hand, we whip out REQ's fairly quickly
- and I suppose in the end we could just
tell people not to disable synchronous
negotiation in order to talk to a 1989
QLogic WD33C9x. :(

Pat LaVarre






More information about the T10 mailing list