ATA Meetings and Tom Hanan's suggestion
TFINCHS%A1.VAX2T.mrouter at vax2t.tus.ssi1.com
Thu Jul 7 08:09:37 PDT 1994
I prefer to receive information, complaints, etc. from people about meeting
locations and would prefer all to see these comments. Please do not send
to one person and allow possible filtering of information.
I believe it is ANSI policy to distribute meetings geographically. In the
past, we have had mostly volunteers to host from the Bay Area in
California, but recently we have had volunteers from other locals.
Recently, we have also had a lack of volunteers for the Bay Area. The
result is that the tentative schedule has been described.
Remember that the final schedule is what is authorized by X3T10, not the
working group although the working group has a very significant voice in
My questions are:
Are there Bay Area volunteers?
Who, besides Jim McGrath, object to geographic distribution of meetings?
Who would object to Bay Area only locations?
Please, voice over the reflector as this is an ATA subject.
My personal opinion goes for geographic distribution. It helps me as I
visit customers through out the country and I always schedule visits to
customers when traveling to these meetings, killing two stones with one
bird (so to speak).
Fx: 714 573-6916
email: 5723283 at mcimail.com
More information about the T10