X3T9.2/90-039 March 1, 1990 Mr. Ronald Graczyk CompuAdd Corporation 12303 Technology Blvd. Austin, TX 78127 Subject: Response to BSR X3.131-198x (SCSI-2) Public Review Comment #6 Dear Mr. Graczyk, Thank you for your interest in the SCSI-2 draft proposed standard. The X3T9.2 committee has reviewed your public review comment (X3T9.2/90-008) suggesting that a high-density ribbon contact connector be included in the standard. The committee has devoted considerable attention to the connector issue. You mention usage problems with some pin-and-receptacle connectors as the reason the "large" ribbon connectors were developed. As you probably know, SCSI-1 included a miniature ribbon connector (0.085-inch contact centers) after problems with its original pin-and-socket connector became apparent. The X3T9.2 committee certainly shared your concern when selecting the high- density SCSI-2 connector. The fact that they selected a tab-and-receptacle contact design in spite of the previous experience serves to demonstrate the robust design of these high-density connectors. They have been in production for several years and are available from at least three vendors. No usage problems have been reported to the committee. Connector selection for I/O interface standards is always a difficult and time-consuming process. X3T9.2 had many excellent connector proposals from which to select, including several that employed ribbon contacts. After a successive elimination voting procedure, the current high-density connector was selected. The final design was endorsed by a roll-call vote which passed 48 Yes, 7 No, 0 Abstain, and 13 Absent. The committee has also consistently rejected the idea of including more than one high-density connector design in the SCSI-2 draft standard. This would weaken the standard and create market confusion. Accordingly, X3T9.2 has voted against adding a ribbon-contact connector to the SCSI-2 standard. Please send a written statement to the X3 Secretariat (Attn: Lynn Barra) within fifteen working days saying whether you accept or reject this response. If you do not respond within fifteen working days, the Secretariat will assume that you have withdrawn the comment. Sincerely Yours, Del Shoemaker, X3T9 Chairman cc: L. Barra, X3 Secretariat J. Lohmeyer, X3T9.2 Chairman J. Ryland, SPARC Liaison