From: David Burg <daviburg@windows.microsoft.com>
To: "mtfuji5@avc-pioneer.com" <mtfuji5@avc-pioneer.com>
CC: T10 <T10@t10.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:02:59 -0700
Subject: RE: Proposal: change of the error code
X-Message-Number: 8987
Formatted message: HTML-formatted message
Attachment #1: image001.png

Dear Katata-san,
Is fuji7r100 not the latest version? I am looking at fuji7r100 and I do not
see the same text as you describe:
[cid:image001.png@01C8F2F4.9CF1E660]
With regards,
David.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mtfuji5@avc-pioneer.com [mailto:owner-mtfuji5@avc-pioneer.com] On
Behalf Of keiji_katata@post.pioneer.co.jp
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 2:23 AM
To: mtfuji5@avc-pioneer.com
Cc: T10
Subject: Proposal: change of the error code
Hello all,
Pioneer would like to propose a change of an error code.
Originally added sentence before table 769 on page 863.
"Once a write command is received this command shall be terminated with CHECK
CONDITION status, 2/04/08 LOGICAL UNIT NOT READY, LONG WRITE IN PROGRESS."
Proposed sentence:
"Once a write command is received this command shall be terminated with CHECK
CONDITION status, 05/2C/00 Command Sequence Error."
Reason:
"LONG WRITE IN PROGRESS" means that later drive may accept the command. But
this
case is the error of the sequence. Therefore "Command Sequence Error" is
appropriate.
Please send any comment to reflector or me.
Best regards,
Keiji Katata
PIONEER CORP.