Subject: Error in SPC-4 r15 Table 406
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:31:00 -0600
From: "Paul Suhler" <Paul.Suhler@Quantum.Com>
To: <t10@t10.org>
X-Message-Number: 8975
Formatted message: HTML-formatted message

Hi, everyone.
I noticed a mismatch between two values in the above table (security
association identification payload ID TYPE field) and those in RFC 4306,
pages 57 - 58.	 The values should match, so ID_KEY_ID should be 11
(0Bh) and ID_FC_NAME should be 12 (0Ch), as stated in RFC 4306.
David Black, co-author of T10/07-437r4 confirmed that they should match
and he and Ralph Weber decided that it was an editorial mistake when the
proposalwasincorporated.  Ralph's proposed resolution is to correct the
table in r16 as an editorial change.
Thanks,
Paul
___________________________________
Paul A. Suhler | Firmware Engineer | Quantum Corporation | Office:
949.856.7748 | paul.suhler@quantum.com <mailto:paul.suhler@quantum.com> 
___________________________________
Disregard the Quantum Corporation confidentiality notice below.  The
information contained in this transmission is not confidential.
Permission is hereby explicitly granted to disclose, copy, and further
distribute to any individual(s) or organization(s), without restriction.
-----------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may be 
confidential. Any disclosure, copying, or further 
distribution of confidential information is not permitted 
unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by 
Quantum Corporation. Furthermore, Quantum Corporation is not 
responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the 
substance of this communication or for any delay in its 
receipt.
------------------------------------------------------------