I support Katata-san.

The REQUEST SENSE command is very useful in monitoring the progress
of long-running operations, some of which have been pushed into the
background by setting the IMMED bit to one.

In fact, I have just posted a proposal to enhance this capability.

http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.08/08-263r0.pdf

All the best,

.Ralph

keiji_katata@post.pioneer.co.jp wrote:

* From the T10 Reflector (t10@t10.org), posted by:
* keiji_katata@post.pioneer.co.jp
*

In the case of autosense environment, to see the progress indication in the
sense data, you may use the request sense command alone.

Best regards,

Keiji Katata
PIONEER CORP.





Mark Overby <moverby@nvidia.com> <mailto:moverby@nvidia.com> @t10.org on 2008/06/26 11:06:24

送信者:     owner-t10@t10.org







宛先:  Eddy Quicksall <Quicksall_SCSI@Bellsouth.net> <mailto:Quicksall_SCSI@Bellsouth.net> , <t10@t10.org> <mailto:t10@t10.org>
cc:
件名:  Re: using Request Sense

For protocols that use autosense, probably not.
For protocols that do not have autosense, you bet. (There are quite a few wide
spread protocols that do not have autosense capability).


On 6/25/08 6:51 PM, "Eddy Quicksall" <Quicksall_SCSI@bellsouth.net> <mailto:Quicksall_SCSI@bellsouth.net>  wrote:

      Since some protocols use autosense then the sense data will be cleared
      when a command creates the condition and request sense will just get back
      "no sense".

      Is there a case where request sense is still useful?

      Eddy


This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
message.





*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo@t10.org