Hi Alvin, Guilllaume
and fellow SAS workgroup members,
I am unable to join the
call tomorrow morning, but like to submit the following
comments:
I like Guillaume’s
presentation on inverse JTF. I suggest picking values for 270 kHz instead of 240
kHz on slides 10, 21 and 22 as 240 kHz is an even harmonic and the SSC waveform
generally have more energy at odd harmonics. This will also have the points on
the line spaced more evenly. Further there is indeed test equipment available
which include all of the 3 functions at the far left of slide 16 in one
instrument plus programmable de-emphasis as an additional option (several of the
other member on the call already have this equipment).
Sincerely,
SyntheSys Research,
Inc.
(650)
364-1853
From:
owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf Of
Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:28
To: t10@t10.org
Subject: Reminder, SAS PHY WG call, June
12, 10:00am CDT
Toll Free Dial in Number:
(877)810-9442
International Access/Caller
Paid Dial In Number: (636)651-3190
PARTICIPANT CODE:
3243413
Webex information:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate
Topic: SAS-2 PHY WG
Date: Thursday
Time: 10:00 am, Central
Daylight Time
Meeting number: 826 515 680
Meeting password: 6gbpsSAS
Agenda:
1. Letter ballot comment
resolution status [Elliott]
2. External
mini-SAS Cable keying
3. Update on receiver testing.
[Witt, Newman]
Comments on reverse JTF? http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.08/08-248r0.pdf
Alvin Cox
Seagate
Technology, LLC
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail
alvin.cox@seagate.com