Hi Alvin, Guilllaume and fellow SAS
workgroup members,
I am unable to join the call tomorrow
morning, but like to submit the following comments:
I like Guillaume’s presentation on
inverse JTF. I suggest picking values for 270 kHz instead of 240 kHz on slides
10, 21 and 22 as 240 kHz is an even harmonic and the SSC waveform generally
have more energy at odd harmonics. This will also have the points on the line
spaced more evenly. Further there is indeed test equipment available which
include all of the 3 functions at the far left of slide 16 in one instrument plus
programmable de-emphasis as an additional option (several of the other member
on the call already have this equipment).
Sincerely,
SyntheSys Research, Inc.
(650) 364-1853
From: owner-t10@t10.org
[mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf Of Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008
7:28
To: t10@t10.org
Subject: Reminder, SAS PHY WG
call, June 12, 10:00am CDT
Toll Free Dial in Number: (877)810-9442
International
Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (636)651-3190
PARTICIPANT
CODE: 3243413
Webex
information:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate
Topic:
SAS-2 PHY WG
Date:
Thursday
Time:
10:00 am, Central Daylight Time
Meeting
number: 826 515 680
Meeting
password: 6gbpsSAS
Agenda:
1.
Letter ballot comment resolution status [Elliott]
2.
External mini-SAS Cable keying
3.
Update on receiver testing. [Witt, Newman]
Comments on reverse JTF? http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.08/08-248r0.pdf
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail alvin.cox@seagate.com