Pat,

"We" (including you) are allowed to discuss any SCSI subject you like
here. However, some (dare I say many) of us think this particular
subject amounts to flogging a dead horse.

For example, my best guess is that you have zero change of seeing
a single work of SPC-4 changed as a result of any past or future
discussions of this topic.

 We are hoping the root canal will end soon, but that is almost
entirely your call.

As for creating a reflector devoted to the question: "How many
ways can I misinterpret an American National Standard?" ...
I find the prospect repugnant in the extreme.

Regards,

.Ralph

plavarre@lexar.com wrote: 
* From the T10 Reflector (t10@t10.org), posted by:
* <plavarre@lexar.com>
*
  
I'm sorry, I don't see any problem with the text in SPC-4 at present.
...
What is unclear about that?
    

Yes, I'm delighted always to find another person on Earth fascinated by
such obscure details.

No, I don't think we're allowed to discuss this Subject further here.

I look forward to the launch of T10.wikidot.com.

*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo@t10.org