Would it not be easier to have just a free-running scrambler where the output is muxed into the data stream instead of adding extra logic to pause the scrambler for primitives. So, yes, Primitive are not scrambled, however, I would prefer to not have to pause the idle data generator every time in need to insert a primitive.

 

Are we expecting to be able to descramble the data and verify that it is really all zeros?

 

Regards,

 

David Freeman

 


From: owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf Of Stephen FINCH
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 6:47 AM
To: 'Robert Watson'; t10@t10.org
Subject: RE: SAS 2 - scrambler operation

 

I’d like to address the question by use of an example.

 

In a normal frame (between SOF and EOF or between SOAF and EOAF), the scrambler is not advanced is a ALIGN primitive is inserted.  In fact, the scrambler is not be advanced when any primitive is inserted, such as RRDY or ACK.  Since the TRAIN and TRAIN_DONE patterns consists of TRAIN and TRAIN_DONE primitives and scrambled data then, by the example above, the scrambler would not be advanced when the primitive portions of the patterns are sent.

 

In section 7.6 it states:

 

All data dwords are scrambled. Table 117 lists the scrambling for different types of data dwords.”

 

In a brief search of SAS-2, I didn’t find an explicit statement that primitives are not scrambled, but they aren’t.

 

Regards,

 

Steve Finch

 


From: owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf Of Robert Watson
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:19 PM
To: 't10@t10.org'
Subject: SAS 2 - scrambler operation

 

6.7.4.2.3.4 Train-SNW defines two training patterns: TRAIN pattern and TRAIN)DONE pattern. Both are defined as their respective redundant primitive followed by 58 dwords set to 0x00000000 scrambled and 8b10b encoded. Furthermore, the scrambler is initialized at the end of RCDT and is not re-initialized after that.

 

The question we have is : Does the scrambler pause while sending TRAIN or TRAIN_DONE primitives; that is, is the dword following the primitive the scrambler’s successor dword to the dword preceding the primitive? Or does the scrambler run continuously, and TRAIN or TRAIN_DONE is overlayed on top of scrambler dwords? I would expect the former, but I don’t feel that the current draft (sas2r10) is clear in this regard.

 

Thanks,

 

Robert Watson

PMC-Sierra, Inc.