Rob:

It seems that the places that you indicate that you can resume detection of redundant primitives in 089r1 are a little early.  In the second row, you indicate that you can detect another redundant A after only 2 Redundant B primitives.  The second instance of resuming detection of Redundant A is after 2 Redundant A and 4 Redundant B.  This is six primitives, but does not meet the rule above the diagram that specifies that the six primitives are “not one of the following: a) the original primitive; or …”

The same problem exists in the third row of this figure.  This may be correct if you are reducing the number of other primitives that need to be detected before detecting a second instance of the redundant primitive to three; however, there are still some issues.

Bill Martin

Emulex
Office of Technology
Industry Standards
916 772-3658
916 765-6875 (Cell)
bill.martin@emulex.com