To: t10@t10.org
Subject: Reminder: SAS PHY WG teleconference 6/28, 10 am CDT
From: Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:02:30 -0500
X-Message-Number: 7879
Formatted message: HTML-formatted message

Next call June 28.
Toll Free Dial in Number: (877)810-9442 
International Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (636)651-3190 
PARTICIPANT CODE: 3243413 
Webex information: 
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate 
Topic: SAS-2 PHY WG 
Date: Thursday 
Time: 10:00 am, Central Daylight Time (GMT -05:00, Chicago) 
Meeting number: 826 515 680 
Meeting password: 6gbpsSAS 
1. CJTPAT versus JTPAT
Should we stick with CJTPAT as the required pattern and not allow JTPAT as 
an equivalent? 
Discussion leaned toward CJTPAT being a more stringent test since it 
includes a wider spectral content. 
Question to all: 
Do the header and CRC need to be valid? If these are generated by a tester 
that just makes up fake data, is that acceptable for the test? 
2. Review of Annex B since de-embedding has a significant impact at 6Gbps.
3. Interim meeting
4. StatEye update
5. New items
6. SAS-2 6Gbps PHY Electrical Specification 
http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.07/07-063r8.pdf
Watch for rev 9 to be posted prior to meeting.
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Office 405-381-8067
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail	alvin.cox@seagate.com