To: Larry.McMillan@wdc.com
Cc: t10@t10.org
Subject: Re: SAS PHY teleconference 5/24/07, 10 am CDT: Definition of BUJ and T10/07-259r0
From: Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:08:45 -0500
X-Message-Number: 7813
Formatted message: HTML-formatted message

I understand your concerns, however, rather than spend too much time on 
the terms to get to the end result, let's start from the end result and 
work backwards. I think the bottom line Mike was trying to share is:
TJ at ref RX output is "noncompensable jitter"
Instead of picking on the terms, how about proposing what you think SAS 
should use? I'm in no way intending to be disrespectful, but you are 
correct that the terms don't match up with these other references and we 
may need to define something new to accomplish what we want. Such a 
proposal will help us to complete the spec.
Thank you for the references.
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Office 405-381-8067
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail	alvin.cox@seagate.com