I have posted an update to “Effect
of Crosstalk on HP25 SNR Margin” (http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.07/07-162r1.pdf
). The effect of 3 linearly summed aggressors with worst case phase has
been added. The resulting SNR still guarantees better than 1e-15 BER.
Also, I have noticed that there is one
number (circled below) in 07-063r3 that does not agree with the proposal.
(Ref: 07-001r2, slide 7) The value -7.9 dB in the expression for SCC22
should be -5.0 dB.
Regards,
Mike
From:
owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On
Behalf Of Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007
1:11 PM
To: t10@t10.org
Subject: Reminder: SAS PHY WG
conference call, 4/5/07, 10:00 am CDT
Toll Free Dial in Number: (866) 279-4742
International Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (309) 229-0118
PARTICIPANT CODE: 3243413
Webex information:
https://seagate.webex.com/seagate
Topic: SAS-2 PHY WG
Date: Thursday
Time: 10:00 am, Central Daylight Time (GMT -05:00, Chicago)
Meeting number: 826 515 680
Meeting password: 6gbpsSAS
Agenda:
We will continue our discussion on the number of taps for the reference
receiver.
Jitter
discussion:
Test
patterns, values, and measurement methodology.
Agenda
for face-to-face:
Transmitter
specification
Receiver
specification
Physical TCTF
DFE performance model?
Channel
specification (reference transmitter and receiver plus simulation?)
Cable
specification
No
call on 4/12.
Alvin Cox
Seagate Technology, LLC
Tel 405-350-7424
Cell 405-206-4809
E-Mail alvin.cox@seagate.com