Hi
Dave,
Could you clarify the
difference between options A & B?
Regards,
Paul
Wassenberg
Marvell
Semiconductor
From:
owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 12:34
PM
To: t10@t10.org
Cc: t11_3@t11.org
Subject: FCP-4: Continuously Increasing
SEQ_CNT
Howdy
All,
At the last FCP-4 working group
meeting I presented a proposal to request the use of continuously
increasing SEQ_CNT (CISC) for Class 3
service.
While most believe requiring
continuously increasing SEQ_CNT for Class 3 service is a good idea, one vendor
indicated that none of their implementations support CISC, and another vendor
was concerned about the requirement.
As such, we have the following
options:
a. require CISC for Class 3 service.
This means that existing implementations can claim compliance to a prior
standard (e.g., FCP-3);
b. specify that CISC should be used
for Class 3 service;
c. no change (i.e., CISC is not
required except for streamed Sequences).
My preference would be option
a.
What say
ye?
...Dave
(no
disclaimer)