Hi Dave,
Could you clarify the difference between
options A & B?
Regards,
Paul Wassenberg
Marvell Semiconductor
From:
owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On
Behalf Of
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006
12:34 PM
To: t10@t10.org
Cc: t11_3@t11.org
Subject: FCP-4: Continuously
Increasing SEQ_CNT
Howdy All,
At the last FCP-4 working group meeting I presented a
proposal to request the use of continuously increasing SEQ_CNT (CISC) for
Class 3 service.
While most believe requiring continuously increasing SEQ_CNT
for Class 3 service is a good idea, one vendor indicated that none of their
implementations support CISC, and another vendor was concerned about the
requirement.
As such, we have the following options:
a. require CISC for Class 3 service. This means that
existing implementations can claim compliance to a prior standard (e.g.,
FCP-3);
b. specify that CISC should be used for Class 3 service;
c. no change (i.e., CISC is not required except for streamed
Sequences).
My preference would be option a.
What say ye?
...Dave
(no disclaimer)