Subject: RE: Hash address Generation
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:04:35 -0500
From: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>
To: <t10@t10.org>
X-Message-Number: 7305
Attachment #1: smime.p7s

The hashed addresses just allow a second level check and are not crucial to
any operation. 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf 
> Of Sandeep taneja
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 11:53 AM
> To: t10@t10.org
> Cc: Monika
> Subject: Hash address Generation
> 
> * From the T10 Reflector (t10@t10.org), posted by:
> * Sandeep taneja <sandeep.taneja@nsysinc.com>
> *
> Hi all
> 
> I have a little doubt regarding the Hash Address generation Logic
> 
> Ques:  The following two 64 bit address maps to same 24 bit address
> 
> 64 bit address value	 23 bit hash adress 
> 00000000_00000001h	  DB2777h
> FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFFh	  DB2777h
> 
> Then How Hash address is used to check that whether frame is routed
> properly or not , as from this we can assume that Hash 
> Generation Logic
> is not One to One (64 bit address maps to unique 24 bit hash address
> value).
> 
> 
> Plz suggest.........
> 
> regards 
> Sandeep
> 
> 
> *
> * For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
> * 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo@t10.org
>