* From the T10 Reflector (t10@t10.org), posted by:
* "Katsuki Hattori" <khattori@nero.com>
*
Dear Mr.Duden,
Probably, this is the editorial miss of MMC5r03a.
I checked "the latest Fuji document, the latest BDCommand document, and MMC3/4 document."
This part of these documents was the same description as MMC5r03.
Hello Bill,
Is this a simple miss?
Thanks and best regards,
*********************************************************
Katsuki Hattori
Research & Standardization division
Manager
Nero K.K.
Rover Center-kita 8F
1-2-2 Nakagawa-chuou, Tsuzuki-ku
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 224-0003, Japan
NERO - BECAUSE TECHNOLOGY COUNTS
www.nero.com
www.nerodigital.com
*********************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-t10@t10.org [mailto:owner-t10@t10.org] On Behalf
Of Jan-Eric Duden
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 6:59 PM
To: t10@t10.org
Subject: MMC5r03a: Close Track Session Command - "Close
Function" moved from Byte 2 to Byte 3
* From the T10 Reflector (t10@t10.org), posted by:
* Jan-Eric Duden <jdu@ashampoo.com>
*
Hallo,
I just checked out the MMC05r03a draft. The Close Track
Session CDB changed from r03 to r03a.
In r03a the Close Function bits are now located in byte 3
instead of byte 2.
Is this correct or a mistake?
--
MfG / Regards
Jan-Eric Duden
ashampoo Technology GmbH & Co. KG
http://tech.ashampoo.com
http://www.ashampoo.com
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo@t10.org
*
* For T10 Reflector information, send a message with
* 'info t10' (no quotes) in the message body to majordomo@t10.org