Subject: RE: [T11.3] FC-LS: TPRLO format and usage
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:36:09 -0500
From: "David Peterson" <David.Peterson@mcdata.com>
To: <t11_3@mail.t11.org>, <t10@t10.org>
Cc: 
Formatted message: HTML-formatted message

One more question: Is anyone using the Third Party Originator
Process_Associator and Responder Process_Associator fields in the TPRLO
Request payload?
If I receive no replies indicating they are used, I will also propose
that these fields be obsoleted too.
Thanks...Dave 
(no disclaimer)
________________________________
	From: t11_3-bounces@listserve.com
[mailto:t11_3-bounces@listserve.com] On Behalf Of David Peterson
	Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:34 AM
	To: t11_3@mail.t11.org
	Subject: [T11.3] FC-LS: TPRLO format and usage
	Howdy,
	Here is the plan that was agreed upon at the June FC-LS working
group meeting:
	- the Third Party Originator N_Port_ID field in the request
payload will be obsoleted
	- the Global bit shall be set to one in the request payload
	- the Responder may reject the TPRLO request if the Global bit
is not set to one
	- the LS_ACC payload is the same as the request payload
	Please reply if you have any objections along with your
reasoning.
	Thanks...Dave
	(no disclaimer)